I have no words to explain the situation described by NYTime in this article today. Please find 10 minutes to read the NYTimes article, it clarifies how seems to be difficult doing research in China.
Directly from NYTimes :
[….]“We usually say ‘attack’ so you can see what would happen,” he said. “My emphasis is on how you can protect this. My goal is to find a solution to make the network safer and better protected.” And independent American scientists who read his paper said it was true: Mr. Wang’s work was a conventional technical exercise that in no way could be used to take down a power grid.The difference between Mr. Wang’s explanation and Mr. Wortzel’s conclusion is of more than academic interest. It shows that in an atmosphere already charged with hostility between the United States and China over cybersecurity issues, including large-scale attacks on computer networks, even a misunderstanding has the potential to escalate tension and set off an overreaction.“Already people are interpreting this as demonstrating some kind of interest that China would have in disrupting the U.S. power grid,” said Nart Villeneuve, a researcher with the SecDev Group, an Ottawa-based cybersecurity research and consulting group. “Once you start interpreting every move that a country makes as hostile, it builds paranoia into the system.”[….]
Poor guys …
2 thoughts on “ Chinese Academic Paper: a mess ”
I've been looking to figure out a place to begin with the acai berry free trial & was just wanting to know if anybody had any thoughts on whether or not it works for dieting? So far this is the only [url=http://blogbud.com/cgi-bin/index.pl?sitename=acaiberrydetox&item=home]article[/url] I have been able to check out that seemed realistic for what my goals are. Thoughts?
Understandably your article helped me very much in my college assignment. Hats incorrect to you post, choice look audacious in the direction of more interdependent articles without delay as its one of my favourite topic to read.